From the Offices of:<\/p>\n
Lee Stickem,<\/p>\n
Elisabeth Tooya,<\/p>\n
And Tyler Howe<\/p>\n
Esquires<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Dear Professor Geoffrey Strickland,<\/p>\n
It has come to our attention that you have submitted a paper to the\u00a0Journal of Amazing Mathematics<\/em>entitled \u201cA Simple and Concise Proof of Goldbach\u2019s June 30th<\/sup>, 1742 Conjecture\u201d, which we are going to kindly ask that you withdraw due to copious infringement of the patents held by our client, Consolidated Venture Solutions Inc., herein referred to as CVSI. As we are sure that you are aware the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Aug, 16 2011 decided the case\u00a0Cybersource Corp. V. Retail Decisions, Inc.<\/em>, which set the precedent that if the Mathematics is sufficiently hard then it is patentable. After which, and pursuant to, our client CVSI acquired the patents to many Theorems, Corollaries, and Lemmas, of which you find yourself in violation of no less than five.<\/p>\n The process through which these infringements are determined are as simple as they are effective. First your paper was converted to a machine readable format, then it was fed into an automated proof checker, this proof checker then analyses all of your steps for validity and determines which prior results are needed to justify the previous step, and finally these results are checked against our database of patents. This is the same process that the Federal Government uses when verifying the foundations of governmentally funded work. The five major violations, and there were many minor violations that we are simply not going to pursue at this point in time, were:<\/p>\n 1. Line 34, Page 6 \u201cIt clearly follows that \u2026\u201d<\/p>\n In fact it is not clear, it actually uses the result, \u201cIf the primes between\u00a0n<\/em>\u00a0and\u00a0n+1<\/em>\u00a0are sufficiently spectral then\u2026\u201d as proven by J.L. Discher and I.K. Remmington in their paper \u201cPrimes and Their Auras\u201d in\u00a0Ars Arithmancy<\/em>\u00a044<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong>2. Line 2, Page 13 \u201cWe can therefore claim the following\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n You can claim what follows but only if you take into account that, \u201cFor any given collection of numbers we have shown that the following are true\u2026\u201d shown by E.O. Dann in \u201cNumerical Groupings as Determined by Scaling Large Cardinality\u201d published in\u00a0Journal of the National Academies of the Royal Society of Lichtenstein<\/em>\u00a0274(5)<\/strong><\/p>\n 3. Line 45, Page 13 \u201cNow assume that this is true for\u00a0n<\/em>\u00a0and\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n In fact you do not have to assume it is true as \u201cThe following is true for all integers\u2026\u201d was determined by Q.W. Sullivan, W.P. Lee, and A.A. Paint in the seminal paper \u201cNumerous True Theorems about the Integers\u201d published as a supplement to the New York Mathematical Association\u2019s\u00a0A Stupendously Huge Collection of Things about Integers that are True<\/em><\/p>\n 4. Line 22, Page 15 \u201cSince even integers can be written as\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n You can write all even integers as such, but only by using \u201cThis shows that all even integers can be written as\u2026\u201d elucidated so clearly in Y.E. Granner and C.X. Xon\u2019s, \u201cThe Impact of Repeated Enhancement on Non-Transcendental Numbers\u201d from\u00a0The<\/em>Mathematical Consequences of Procedurals\u00a0<\/em>97<\/strong><\/p>\n 5. Line 37, Page 17 \u201cWith this I have proven the Goldbach Conjecture.\u201d<\/p>\n In fact you will find that in many previous court decisions the person who first writes down a theory is given priority in patent fights and therefore you can not claim priority on the Goldbach Conjecture, as Goldbach\u2019s claim is more than two centuries before yours. As CVSI owns the collected work of Goldbach they thereby own the Conjecture.<\/p>\n \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0We, of course, would have no issue helping you and CVSI reach an agreement over licensing the patents that you infringed, and such an action would allow you to publish your paper without the spectre of future legal issues. In fact, CVSI has even indicated that they would be willing to give you a share of the residuals that will, without doubt, be derived from Goldbach Conjecture licensing, in respect to the quality of work displayed in your paper. If you do decide to go forward with the publication of this paper without licensing though, we will immediately file a lawsuit that we will win and you will not see a cent.<\/p>\n We hope that you make the right decision, and that you and CVSI can reach a mutually beneficial agreement that will allow you to continue contributing such important work to mathematics,<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Reginald Leach, Esq.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" From the Offices of: Lee Stickem, Elisabeth Tooya, And Tyler Howe Esquires Dear Professor Geoffrey Strickland, It has come to our attention that you have submitted a paper to the\u00a0Journal of Amazing Mathematicsentitled \u201cA Simple and Concise Proof of Goldbach\u2019s June 30th, 1742 Conjecture\u201d, which we are going to kindly ask that you withdraw […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4,5],"tags":[21,27,33,41,54],"class_list":["post-72","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sh","category-pred","tag-farce","tag-goldbach-conjecture","tag-hard-mathematics","tag-math-patents","tag-patent-trolls"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p1MKuB-1a","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/minds.acmescience.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/minds.acmescience.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/minds.acmescience.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/minds.acmescience.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/minds.acmescience.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=72"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/minds.acmescience.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/minds.acmescience.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=72"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/minds.acmescience.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=72"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/minds.acmescience.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=72"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}